What is IBM data breach report and why we love it?
IBM started 14 years ago to survey companies globally for the cost of data breaches. While there are many reports/surveys that do exactly that, the value differentiator of IBM is the cost mitigation factor. For the first time, we have a clear return on investment indication of the cost of the controls versus the cost of the breach. If you haven't read this report, I strongly suggest that you read it and dissect it inside and out.
In this article, we will do a deep dive on the report, what we can read from it, and what lessons we can draw from it.
To read the report, search IBM Data Breach report or get it from here: IBM Cost of Data Breach Report 2023
We found that the report does not cover many Australian companies. Only 24 Australian companies have been included in the survey. This is not large enough to support a statistically significant analysis, so more work is needed in future years for Australian companies and smaller businesses.
We would love to see more focus on companies with fewer than 500 employees. Currently, this is only stated as a single category. Taking into consideration that 80% of businesses in Australia have fewer than 500 employees, we would love to see a governing body (such as ASCS) adopt a similar methodology to provide more insight into breaches.
We are not sure of IBM's strategy for approaching customers, but we would invite anyone who has the opportunity to respond to the IBM data breach survey to do so, as this would benefit all companies.
Mega breaches
Optus, Latitude, and Medibank should read and consider this section, as their names are all over it. While IBM states that a sample of 20 companies with more than 1 million records breached is too small to draw conclusions, they use Monte Carlo simulation to estimate and generalize their findings. In plain English, this sample is too small and prone to significant deviation errors. In our experience, we believe that the figure of USD 332 million placed by IBM is very conservative.
To be on the fair side, the tangible breach costs from the 3 recent largest breaches in Australia are as follows[1]:
The above, akin to IBM breach is too small to generalize; in addition, there is too much variation in costs. We believe that Optus has been more transparent of the cost than Medibank and Latitude. Finally, it should be noted that this number does not take into account the class action that is currently in place.
Data breach cost mitigation
This section is the holy grail and most important part of the report. It is what makes the IBM report so useful and stands out from the crowd. It should be prioritized and drive security strategy and priorities. If people are too impatient to read the entire report, they should at least read and consider this section.
Comments on the Cost Mitigation
Closing thoughts
Every year, this report provides us with great insights on the cost of data breach, mitigating factors and what companies need to prioritise in their security investment. It however lacks larger sample base to be able to conclusively generalise the findings. We also strongly welcome and encourage including more Australian based data that cover SMB more granularly.